|
Executive
Forum 2002
Managing Competitive Advantage: The Values of National Strategy
SESSION 6 SUMMARY
Saturday, 28 September, 2002
Session 6: Strategy, Networking and What’s Happening in
“e”?
The objectives of Session Six were to find out whether the
techniques the Executive Forum has explored over the past three years have
served their purposes, and whether past decisions about export strategy were
still valid, said Panel Chair Ramamurti Badrinath, Director, Division of Trade
Support Services, ITC. The first Executive Forum redefined trade promotion from
assisting exporters, to partnering between the public and private sectors. The
2000 event focused on the role of IT. In 2001, participants recognized more
clearly that trade promotion was not the sole focus of TPOs, but that an
ever-larger network of players needed to be coordinated.
Thomas Aquino, from the Department of Trade and Industry,
Philippines, explained in some detail the Philippines structure, which includes
a three year export strategy programme enshrined in law. The reality of
Philippines exports, is that more than 90% of exporters are SMEs, while
electronics, garments, and auto parts and components, accounts for 80% of the
exports. “From a strategic standpoint, we need to have more market place
selection and diversification,” said Aquino, noting that decision making on
the existing major export sectors remained very much under the direction of
MNCs.
Aquino stressed the close coordination between public and
private sector, through a range of agencies and bureaux. There is also an
Export Development Council, an umbrella group, which is a major driver and
includes government representatives and private sector members selected on the
basis of geographic and sectoral criteria.
Summing up, Badrinath commented that the Philippines example
demonstrated that trade promotion would not just take place. “You must have a
strategy. You need an active network.”
Michael Hannah of Trade New Zealand reported that New Zealand,
concerned about lower rates of growth than comparable countries, had
established a Growth and Innovation Framework to try and increase value-added
exports. Agriculture, forestry, processing and fishing accounts for around 60%
of exports, while the base of exporters is small, with 115 accounting for 85%
of export earnings, and most of that coming from an even smaller group of large
producer boards.
“We needed to address the problem through more than the TPO,”
said Hannah. “We needed to enhance our human capital, innovations, access to
global networks.” The focus is on ICT, biotech and creative industries, such
as the background technical industry that has supported the making of films
such as Lord of the Rings in New Zealand. “Within government, the challenge
has been coordination and alignment. We need a more efficient face for the
private sector to deal with.”
There are four agencies involved in the framework, which is
still an informal network: Tertiary Education Commission: Foundation for
Research, Science and Technology, Industry New Zealand (providing
regional/business assistance), and Trade NZ, responsible for export
development. “The challenge is to provide a seamless service. When you share
a common goal, somewhere along the line two agencies are going to cross
paths.”
Industry NZ and TNZ are to merge (by next July), which Hannah
said was creating challenges associated with putting together two different
business models.
Q: What measures are being put in place to ensure the two
cultures integrated? Any downsizing?
A: There are inevitable overlaps; two boards will become one.
There will be some rationalization.
Q: We’ve been hearing about more mergers. We see the pains
they go through. First, do you really believe these two functions should be
merged?
A: I’m comfortable where it’s heading now. A year ago FDI
was within our organization and we had to make the case for keeping it where
it’s related to our export activities. In our country, infrastructure tends
to be handled through a specialist area and we haven’t tended to get involved
in infrastructure. Whichever agency you put it in, there will be an issue of
coordination.
Faisal Ismail from South Africa, who demonstrated a CDRom
depicting the country’s export strategy, said his original experience was as
a trade negotiator, and that he had to learn trade promotion, learning from the
experience of countries such as Ireland, Sweden, Finland, Canada and New
Zealand. “The thing that came to the fore, the most important thing you could
do, is to organize the private sector. Our exporters didn’t talk to each
other, they weren’t organized.” A series of export councils were set up,
South Africa joined the WTO and worked at building up regional agreements
within southern Africa and with other “southern” economies.
Ismail also stressed a sectoral approach to trade promotion and
the need to diversify geographically. Another key element, he said, was that
exporters initially lacked experience and confidence, imitating foreign designs
and image. To correct this, South Africa worked with the councils and
successful exporters to help create a new national identity “Proudly South
Africa.”
Comments
from the Floor:
Cote D’Yvoire’s Paul Boni expressed doubt that the TPO could
be the sole coordinator in many developing countries, and suggested a
high-level government sponsor was essential.
Another delegate noted that, since this was often not possible,
the TPO could indeed provide the coordinating role.
A Malaysian commented that his country’s policy had been
primarily driven by the prime minister over many years. “If you don’t have
a strong leader committed to this, it’s very difficult to see any progress
made.”
Mike Morris, while agreeing that South Africa’s export
councils had in many cases worked well, commented that some had definitely not.
He stressed there were two critical lower levels below the top level. “You
must have people pushing it from industry side. And it’s critical that the
DTI or government institution, has to have an earmarked person who plays a
critical role. Internal change agents are absolutely critical. And an external
change agent from the government, a a lower, not a coordinating level, is also
crucial.”
E-business
Nicolae Semine of ITC said that, despite the predictions of
explosive growth, after the gold rush most of the senior executives found these
are hallucinations. E-marketplaces are not universal, mainly industrialised
countries. Volumes, private exchanges, invititation only networks. For most
developing countries, must accept e-market conditions as they find them. But
the bursting of the bubble doesn’t mean e-business is over. The major impact
is still to come.
The dotcoms were an enormously useful phenomena. They were a
wakeup call that business cannot operate the way they used to. During the boom,
many enterprises realised that e-business business. E-trade is expanding but
growth remains slow because of regulatory problems and unfamiliarity. Another
aspect restricting growth is the lack of Intellectual Property protections.
There is also a lack of capital now and a lack of trust in key business
processes.
Anton Said from Malta reported that exporters want to engage in
e-trade and consider themselves ready. Unanimous view that TPOs should support
this. National trade support organizations are seen as not being exclusive.
TPOs develop e-trade support to meet the needs of the local
business community, though many are focused on external community. They have
more or less the same objective; they all want to encourage new exports and
exporters. The national TPO acts as the bait in recruiting potential new
exporters and keeping a link with the existing client base on a direct basis
between business. Another school of thought wishes to use the web to bring
together the activities provided by the TPO further enhance access, and in a
way also release the demand on physical resource and facilities.
TPOs are providing institutional information, trade market and
business information, as well as facilities to complete trade transactions.
Degree of intensity of what a TPO does online and its
effectiveness, tends to be related to its success off-line. Other things being
equal, its scope is linked to the credibility that the country enjoys as a
trading partner. Developing country TPOs tend to be promotional. There is
general agreement that TPOs should facilitate access to online services, though
there is recognition that there are often the lack of resources to do this.
There is no single best practice model. “Nobody knows anything. But there are
lessons to be learned and experiences to be shared,” said Said, who
demonstrated the Trade Portal Evaluation Tool.
The ITC is also currently developing an interactive CD Rom tool
to help countries develop their national export strategy, the Secrets of
Success Template. This tool, demonstrated at the opening session, will be
available by the end of the year.
John Humphrey from the University of Sussex Institute of
Development Studies, UK, stressed the huge advantages of e-mail for developing
countries. One of the major uses of the Internet isn’t to find new customers,
but to reinforce the existing client base. If you don’t you may find you’re
losing them.
The Internet will increasingly be used for supply chain
integration, qualify quality, and tracking. "We don’t think the major
obstacle to development t of e-commerce is technological or legal, the main
reason, is that they have a different business model, based on non-contractables
such as trust and repeat transactions that do not work with new
customers."
|