-
FAQ
>
Regional and Preferential agreements and the GSP
-
"World Trading System" - What is it all about?
 
Questions about
Regional and Preferential agreements and the GSP
Topics:
|
Compensation for Loss of Preferential Market Access: |
|
The tariff reductions that are being implemented by
developed countries on a Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) basis as a result of the
Uruguay Round are eroding the margins of preference for developing countries
under the GSP.
Is any compensation for this loss of preferential market access being envisaged?
Compensation for loss
of preference margins under the GSP due to MFN tariff reductions have been
requested from time to time by GSP recipient countries.
|
|
However, the developed
countries extending GSP preferences have consistently refused this
request on the ground that the GSP was a voluntary scheme introduced on
the understanding that it would not prevent the further reduction or
elimination of MFN tariffs in future multilateral trade negotiations.
|
|
Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): |
|
What is the relationship between the multilateral
trading system and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)?
Under the GSP, developed countries have for some
time, on a voluntary and unilateral basis, applied preferential tariff rates to
imports from developing countries, while normal MFN rates are applied to imports
from other countries. Since this amounted to a discriminatory treatment in
favour of developing countries and thereby constituted a deviation from the MFN
principle, the previous GATT at the time of inception of the GSP granted a
general waiver (an exemption from the obligation to treat all member states
alike).
|
|
How long will the
GSP continue to exist?
The GSP is not time-limited,
but national schemes have been subject to frequent changes and
modifications. The tariffs under the GSP are therefore less predictable
than the MNF tariffs which are legally bound in the WTO against
unilateral increases.
|
|
Multi-Fibre Agreement (MFA): |
|
Will the phasing out of the Multi-Fibre Agreement
(MFA) under the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) have any
consequences on the GSP?
The MFA was the legal framework
under which certain developed countries imposed restrictions, such as quotas, on
the volume or value of textile and clothing imports.
The GSP, on the other hand, is an open-ended scheme of tariff preferences in
favour of developing countries--although some GSP donors apply such preferential
treatment only within certain quantity or value limits.
|
|
Therefore, there is no direct legal
linkage between the two arrangements.
However, the phasing-out of MFA restrictions will tend to increase the
importance of the GSP tariff preferences for the supplying developing countries.
|
|
Reconciling with Multilateral Trading System and MFN: |
|
How can regional/preferential agreements be
reconciled with the multilateral trading system and in particular with the most-favoured-nation
(MFN) clause?
While the most-favoured-national
principle of the WTO (under which each member country must accord the same
treatment to all other members) is the cornerstone of the multilateral trading
system, it is at the same time recognized that the volume of trade can be
increased through closer economic integration between countries.
Such integration most frequently takes the form of a
customs union such as the European Union or MERCOSUR, or a free-trade area such
as ASEAN and NAFTA, and provides for preferential market access in trade between
the member states.
|
|
However, the WTO stipulates
that these agreements should not raise barriers to the trade of other
member states of the WTO. It therefore contains strict requirements for
the conclusion of these preferential agreements.
A special WTO committee, set up to examine all such agreements, has the
power to recommend to the parties a modification of the agreements if
they do not respect the conditions and criteria laid down in the WTO. |
|
Requirements for Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas: |
|
Which are the specific requirements of the WTO for
the conclusion of customs unions and free-trade areas?
In a free-trade area:
 |
import duties and other restrictive regulations
of commerce must be eliminated on substantially all the trade between its
members; |
 |
the import regime of the members applicable to
third countries must not be more restrictive compared to the situation
before the creation of the free-trade area.
|
|
|
In a customs union:
 |
the same conditions apply. In addition, however,
its members shall apply the same import duties and other regulations of
commerce vis-a-vis third countries. The members thereby become a single
customs territory. |
Therefore, a customs union is a
tighter economic entity whose members apply a common external tariff to trade
with third countries. In a free-trade area, members may maintain their own
national foreign trade regime, provided that the internal trade is free of
tariffs and other border measures.
|
|